ADVISORY!

The views and opinions expressed in this forum are those of the online action officers and not necessarily those of the Office for Legal Affairs or the Commission on CSC laws, rules and regulations. Also, be reminded that the views of the action officer is a mere advice that does not bind the office.

When posting, you agree that the administrator has the right to delete your posts or ban your account without prior warning in case of non-observance of any of the guidelines.
Guidelines to clients:

1. Please browse the frequently asked questions first to see if there are already the same or related questions that were asked on your query/ies;
2. Official response to issues shall be provided by the concerned office of the Commission, not through this forum;
3. Requests for the status of the case is not allowed in this forum;
4. Questions regarding the scheduled CSC examination will be deleted;
5. This forum is categorized according to subject matter. Please post your queries in appropriate category;
6. Post a descriptive topic name. Give a short summary of your problem/s;
7. No spam in this forum. Your posts will be deleted and your account will be banned without prior warning;
8. Refrain from posting pictures and offensive words or links. Violation of this rule shall give the administrator the right to delete your posts and ban your account without prior warning;
9. Please report to administrators if you see a user violating any of this guidelines;
10. Be respectful to the administrators and users; and
11. Please avoid text-message style substitution of words like “r” for “are” and “u” for “you”. If your message is difficult to understand the administrator shall inform you to rewrite your message.

Solved appropriate offense

Start
Prev
1
Next
End

Bing
Topic Author

5 years 10 months ago #1456 by Bing

Bing created the topic: appropriate offense

hi! pasuggest po anong appropriate offense pag when unathorized use of vehicle po resulted to damage of equipment. ginamit po kasi ng unathorized driver ung vehicle. pwd po ba neglect of duty?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Action Officer 16
Offline

5 years 10 months ago #1470 by Action Officer 16

Action Officer 16 replied the topic: appropriate offense

Please be informed that as a policy, the Commission does not render opinions or rulings on issues that may eventually be the subject of court litigation or appeal before it. This is especially so if the material facts necessary to a judicious adjudication of the issues are not fully presented or substantiated as in this case.

Nonetheless, we would like to invite your attention to Civil Service Commission vs. Ledesma (G.R. No. 154521, September 30, 2005), where Misconduct was defined as “a transgression of some established and definite rule of action, more particularly, unlawful behavior or gross negligence by a public officer. The misconduct is grave if it involves any of the additional elements of corruption, willful intent to violate the law or to disregard established rules, which must be proved by substantial evidence. Otherwise, the misconduct is only simple.”

In the case of Villaviza, Dinnah C., et al., CSC Resolution No. 06-2177 dated December 5, 2006, the Commission ruled that “the administrative offense of Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service covers a wide range of acts or omissions, through which a government employee, either deliberately or by mere ignorance or negligence, effectively compromises the integrity and efficiency of the government service.”

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Start
Prev
1
Next
End