ADVISORY!

The views and opinions expressed in this forum are those of the online action officers and not necessarily those of the Office for Legal Affairs or the Commission on CSC laws, rules and regulations. Also, be reminded that the views of the action officer is a mere advice that does not bind the office.

When posting, you agree that the administrator has the right to delete your posts or ban your account without prior warning in case of non-observance of any of the guidelines.
Guidelines to clients:

1. Please browse the frequently asked questions first to see if there are already the same or related questions that were asked on your query/ies;
2. Official response to issues shall be provided by the concerned office of the Commission, not through this forum;
3. Requests for the status of the case is not allowed in this forum;
4. Questions regarding the scheduled CSC examination will be deleted;
5. This forum is categorized according to subject matter. Please post your queries in appropriate category;
6. Post a descriptive topic name. Give a short summary of your problem/s;
7. No spam in this forum. Your posts will be deleted and your account will be banned without prior warning;
8. Refrain from posting pictures and offensive words or links. Violation of this rule shall give the administrator the right to delete your posts and ban your account without prior warning;
9. Please report to administrators if you see a user violating any of this guidelines;
10. Be respectful to the administrators and users; and
11. Please avoid text-message style substitution of words like “r” for “are” and “u” for “you”. If your message is difficult to understand the administrator shall inform you to rewrite your message.

Question Clarification on the interpretation of Sec. 95 of the revised ORAOHRA

Start
Prev
1
Next
End

Jane Doe
Topic Author

2 years 3 months ago #9405 by Jane Doe

Jane Doe created the topic: Clarification on the interpretation of Sec. 95 of the revised ORAOHRA

I was promoted from Administrative Officer II to Administrative Officer III on July 2021, using my performance rating for the semester ending December 2020 as Administrative Officer II.

Am I allowed to apply again for promotion to Administrative Officer IV position, opening of which was announced by my agency on September 2021:

1. Despite I am only 2 months from my present position of Administrative Officer III?
2. Using my performance rating for the semester ending June 2021 as Administrative Officer II?

Sec. 95 of the ORAOHRA, as revised, did not qualify any length of service in the current position before applying again for promotion or that the rating to be used is that of the present position, but only states that "an employee should have obtained at least Very Satisfactory performance rating in the last rating period prior to the assessment or screening for promotion or transfer."

Please clarify. Thank you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Action Officer 21
Offline

2 years 3 months ago #9407 by Action Officer 21

Action Officer 21 replied the topic: Clarification on the interpretation of Sec. 95 of the revised ORAOHRA

Hi Jane Doe,

As a matter of policy, this Office refrains from rendering categorical opinion on matters and issues that may later on be the subject of an administrative proceeding before the Commission either via an appeal or a complaint. This is to preclude the possibility of prejudgment should an actual administrative case be commenced or instituted based on the said matters or issues.

Be that as it may, as you have stated, Section 95 (1st Pararaph), Rule IX, 2017 ORAOHRA merely provide, that an employee should have obtained at least Very Satisfactory performance rating in the last rating period prior to the assessment or screening for promotion or transfer.

Nevertheless, it is advised to seek clarification from the Human Resource Policies and Standards Office (HRPSO) of the CSC as to the extent or limitations, if any, of the avbovecited rule, considering that rules on appointment and other human resource actions are within its jurisdiction and expertise.

You may get in touch with the said office thru email addressed to Director IV Jennifer L. Timbol at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., or you may also make a direct call to (02) 89514629.

It is hoped that we have guided you on the matter.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

ALG
Offline

1 year 10 months ago #11062 by ALG

ALG replied the topic: Clarification on the interpretation of Sec. 95 of the revised ORAOHRA

We have the same case, did you send an email to HRPSO?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Start
Prev
1
Next
End